Skip to main content
All Posts By

Ramona Midkiff

Congressman Rice urges broadband investment as Marion County services expand

By News

By: Naeem McFadden

MARION, S.C. – Congressman Tom Rice announced he is calling for more rural broadband investment.

In a letter to business owners, Rice said he joined 72 colleagues in sending a bipartisan letter to the President Joe Biden’s administration urging them to include investment in rural broadband in any infrastructure proposal.

“Infrastructure has been a top priority since arriving in Washington,” Rice said. “Many people in our district, and across our nation, lack sufficient broadband infrastructure. Internet connectivity is now more important than ever. In the 21st Century, high-speed broadband is no longer a luxury amenity.”

More students are using e-learning and families are increasingly reliant on the internet for everyday items, he said.

“Rural broadband has become an essential service for families and businesses to succeed,” Rice said. “This is why I have also joined the Rural Broadband Caucus. I look forward to working together toward practical solutions that bridge the digital divide across our nation.”

Marion County state delegates Sen. Kent Williams and Rep. Lucas joined officials from Horry Telephone Cooperative back in November on announcing its expansion serving parts of Marion County.

Gresham and Britton’s Neck communities are now supported through a $1.5 million grant from the South Carolina Broadband Infrastructure Program. HTC is matching the investment.

Officials said more than 400 homes will get broadband access.

House Democrats’ bill would invest $94B to expand broadband internet

By News

Dive Brief:

  •  A group of House Democrats on Thursday introduced the Leading Infrastructure For Tomorrow’s America Act (LIFT America Act),
    legislation that would invest almost $94 billion to expand access to broadband internet to underserved communities.
  •  

  • The bill would allocate $80 billion to deploy high-speed broadband nationwide by funding connections to unserved and
    underserved areas in rural, suburban and urban parts of the country. It would also allocate $5 billion for a new low-interest
    financing program for broadband infrastructure, and $9.3 billion to programs that help broadband affordability and equity.
  •  

  • The funds represent an expansion of the bill’s previous version introduced in May 2019, which allocated $40 billion for
    broadband deployment, $5 billion in low-interest infrastructure financing and aimed to expand access to high-speed internet to
    98% of the country.

Dive Insight:

The legislation also contains provisions to fight climate change, protect the environment and invest in healthcare infrastructure, but the investment in broadband internet is particularly timely as the country marks one year of remote work, education and medical appointments amid the pandemic. The past year has amplified the growing digital divide, highlighting the urgent need for elected leaders to invest in equitable service.

One way the federal government will support low-income residents is through the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) Emergency Broadband Benefit program, which would receive $6 billion to provide a discount of up to $50 a month on broadband for eligible households. The FCC officially established the program late last month, having previously relied on the underutilized Lifeline program last year.

The bill would also focus on distributing funds to deploy broadband in underserved areas, an issue the FCC has tried to get under control after its Broadband Deployment Reports were criticized for vastly overstating service in some areas. Congress tried to find a legislative fix when it passed the Broadband DATA Act last year, directing the FCC to collect more granular data from wired, fixed-wireless, satellite and mobile broadband providers.

But the FCC suggested it may take until 2022 for new maps to be available, drawing a furious response from Republicans on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, who said in a letter that inaccurate mapping “would create additional delays to broadband deployment for millions of Americans.”

Under the LIFT America Act, the FCC would distribute $60 billion of the funds through a competitive bidding process and allocate the rest to states to fund broadband deployment processes of their own. It would also prohibit state governments from enforcing laws that prevent local governments, cooperative and public-private partnerships from delivering their own broadband service. Municipally run internet has gained in popularity in some cities, but often been stymied by state-level legislation blocking it.

In a Facebook post, House Majority Whip Rep. James Clyburn, D-SC, said internet access “will have the same dramatic impact on rural communities as the rural electrification efforts in the last century.” And with the pandemic heightening the importance of remote operations and living arrangements outside cities, experts say it is important to deploy broadband as widely as possible.

“I think there’s going to be people moving out of the big urban areas in the U.S. and looking for places to live that are less crowded, that have good connectivity,” said Jane Coffin, senior vice president of Internet Growth at the Internet Society, a nonprofit that advocates for improved internet access. “Every mayor should be right now building out an open network to get as many people connected at better prices.”

Source: Smart Cities Dive

SC Rep. Jim Clyburn reintroduces bill that funds broadband internet in rural communities

By News

Last year, a few months after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, U.S. Rep. Jim Clyburn, D-S.C., tried to pass a bill that would have provided rural communities across the country with affordable high-speed internet to help with remote schooling and work.

But with a Republican majority in the Senate, the House majority whip’s bill was stymied.

Now, with a Democratic majority in both chambers, Clyburn reintroduced the bill as the Accessible, Affordable Internet for All Act on March 11. It authorizes over $94 billion to ensure both underserved and unserved communities have affordable high-speed internet access.

Clyburn told The Post and Courier the measure will be particularly helpful for rural South Carolinians, including telehealth.

“Broadband is the one thing that can change the character of almost any community,” Clyburn said. “We want to make broadband accessible and affordable for every home in America. And this deal will do that.”

With Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota, introducing companion legislation in the Senate, the bill will likely be carried across the finish line.

“When we invest in broadband infrastructure, we invest in opportunity for all Americans,” Klobuchar said in a media statement. “In 2021, we should be able to bring high-speed internet to every family in America — regardless of their zip code.”

Clyburn has long pushed to address broadband deficits and formed a task force in Congress to specifically focus on the issue last year. In 2020, he also managed to get every member of South Carolina’s congressional delegation to sign a letter saying the issue should be made a priority.

But the bill didn’t see movement, even as the pandemic underscored the need for internet access.

Clyburn said his Republican colleagues from South Carolina support the bill, but he is unsure what they’ll do when the bill comes to the floor.

“They’re all for it,” Clyburn said. “But that’s not saying they’re all going to vote for it.”

Clyburn’s bill calls for:

  • $80 billion to deploy secure and resilient broadband infrastructure for communities nationwide.
  • $5 billion over five years for low-interest financing of broadband deployment.
  • $6 billion for the recently established Emergency Broadband Benefit, which provides a $50 monthly discount on internet plans for low-income Americans anywhere in the country, or $75 for consumers on tribal lands.
  • $1 billion to establish two new grant programs, which will help Americans build digital skills.
  • $2 billion for the Emergency Connectivity Fund, which provides for home internet for students or mobile hotspots.

The Accessible, Affordable Internet for All Act is the latest in several legislative pushes the longtime congressman has made in recent weeks as he capitalizes on the Democratic majority in Washington, D.C., and utilizes his relationship with President Joe Biden to bring his bills across the finish line.

“Now, we have some semblance of authority and power in the House and we have the votes in the Senate for it to become law,” Clyburn said. “And we got a person in the White House to sign it. So you might hear some giddiness in my voice.”

Posted by the Post and Courier

Is the Digital Divide the Newest Social Determinant of Health?

By News

By Sara Heath

The digital divide fuels and is fueled by other leading social determinants of health, ultimately having an impact on patient wellness and health equity.

– As healthcare continues to lean on technological innovations, a new social determinant of health is coming to the forefront: the digital divide.

The digital divide is the chasm between those who have access to technologies and the digital literacy to work them, and those who don’t. In healthcare, the digital divide can lead to disparities in patient portal adoption, telehealth care access, or ability to utilize patient-facing practice management software, like online appointment schedulers.

The question around the digital divide in healthcare is not new. When the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) put patient portal adoption as a key metric in the EHR Incentive Programs, healthcare organizations lamented an older population that wasn’t ready to use the technology.

A digital divide was splitting patient engagement strategies into those for the old and for the young, with many clinicians creating protocol that catered to generational differences.

In more recent years, healthcare experts have learned that the digital divide is more nuanced than that. Some older adults may be excited to utilize telehealth, while a younger, potentially low-income, patient might not have the infrastructure to support it.

Population health leaders are starting to look into the digital divide and where it is leading to health inequities and ultimately health disparities. In uncovering those issues, experts can craft better multimodal patient engagement strategies account for equity.

Below, PatientEngagementHIT outlines where the digital divide has proven a challenge and how it has become a key social determinant of health.

Telehealth disparities create care access gulf

Perhaps most prominently, the digital divide has forced a stark disparity in telehealth adoption and use.

Telehealth saw its heyday during the COVID-19 pandemic, when healthcare providers had to shut their doors to non-urgent healthcare. Telehealth proved an essential way to maintain chronic disease management for high-risk patients.

But that adoption was not equal across different populations. Much like coronavirus case counts, there were stark racial health disparities in pandemic-era telehealth use and adoption.

In September, a study in the Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association found that Black patients were four times more likely than White patients to access the emergency department, not telehealth, during the pandemic’s initial surge.

Older Black and Hispanic patients used telehealth at significantly lower rates than their White and Asian counterparts, and social determinants of health and structural inequity are likely the culprits.

For example, language barriers strongly dissuaded patients from accessing telehealth, the researchers said. Additionally, traditionally underserved patients without a usual source of care may have been more used to accessing the ED, or less able to have an established provider with whom they could pursue telehealth.

Separate data suggested that this digital divide, like other social determinants of health, had an impact on patient health and wellness. An Urban Institute report showed telehealth care access disparities falling along racial lines. Those disparities coincided with high rates of unmet medical needs among those already in poor health and those with public health insurance coverage.

Those patients wanted a telehealth visit but could not receive one, suggesting that the amount patients were accessing telehealth still was not enough, the survey showed.

“As the pandemic stretches on, it is important to ensure that everyone can access needed care,” Mona Shah, senior program officer at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, said in a statement. “Those left behind by telehealth are, in many cases, people who need care most urgently.”

Poor Broadband Creates Rural Digital Divide

The digital divide exists outside of telehealth and racial health disparities. Poor broadband, which refers to the infrastructure that supports any digital health tool, acutely impacts individuals living in rural areas.

In 2017, the American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) asserted broadband is a key social determinant of health, largely because of its role in deepening the digital divide.

Also in 2017, AMIA’s journal published a study showing that poor broadband limited patient portal adoption. At the time, patient portal adoption in Ohio, which has both rural and urban regions, hung at around 30 percent, likely because a whopping one-third of patients reported broadband issues.

According to the North Carolina Broadband Infrastructure Office, there are four key barriers currently limiting broadband access and exacerbating the digital divide:

  • Broadband subscription cost
  • Broadband device, such as digital router, cost
  • Perceived lack of relevance or necessity in an individual’s life
  • Low digital health literacy

The former two barriers need policy intervention, the NC Broadband Infrastructure Office asserted. State and federal legislation can create mechanisms to improve broadband affordability, drive equity in digital health access, and make digital tools more accessible.

The latter two barriers will require a more concerted public education effort, the NC Broadband Infrastructure Office stated.

And as healthcare works to improve digital health literacy among patients, it has started to employ digital health navigators to fill in the blanks in the near-term.

Addressing digital health literacy

Data has confirmed that low digital health literacy—defined by the World Health Organization as the ability to seek, assess, and make use of health information via electronic media—perpetuates digital health inequity.

In February 2021, Florida Atlantic University found that limited access to virtual health information deepened the digital divide. Older, non-White people face more barriers in accessing digital health information than younger, White people, the institution reported.

That limited access to education both perpetuates and is perpetuated by the digital divide, with poor digital literacy begetting more digital literacy problems, the researchers added.

“Currently, digital health technology development is outpacing parallel efforts to conquer the digital health divide, which also has important implications for helping older adults get registered for the COVID-19 vaccine,” Ruth Tappen, EdD, RN, FAAN, lead author and Christine E. Lynn Eminent Scholar FAU’s Christine E. Lynn College of Nursing, said in a statement.

“Portals that allow patients access to their electronic health records, decision aids that prepare patients to discuss options with their providers, making telehealth appointments with providers and so forth, needlessly, though unintentionally, excludes, marginalizes, and disenfranchises those who are older, have low incomes, have low health literacy, and/or are members of minority groups,” Tappen continued.

Patient navigation is proving a critical tool in combatting this digital health literacy, and subsequent digital divide, problem.

At Nemours Children’s Health, which has heavily utilized health IT as part of its care management strategies and ramped that up during the pandemic, patient navigators were instrumental.

Alongside the rest of the industry, Nemours saw COVID-19 reveal a steep digital divide that kept some populations from engaging with its virtual care access and patient education options as much as others.

“During that time, we realized that in order to scale up to this extent, we needed to make sure that the patients were ready on the other end. And it was clear they were not,” Gina Altieri, Nemours executive vice president and enterprise chief communications officer, said in an interview with PatientEngagementHIT.

“They had no idea how to download the app. They had no idea how to make sure that their internet connection was appropriate.”

Altieri said the digital divide impacts two types of patients: those without devices or adequate infrastructure support, like broadband, and those without the digital health literacy necessary to engage with virtual tools.

At this early stage, most organizations, like Nemours, can only begin to address digital health literacy, which is no easy feat. Clinicians are already overburdened with integrating virtual care access themselves, making it far too onerous to ask them to walk their patients through a telehealth visit or engaging with the patient portal.

Nemours took advantage of a number of staffers whose jobs no longer existed in a pandemic world—someone who operates the front desk, for example—and reengaged those workers as digital health navigators.

“We said, ‘Okay, your job is to get the patient and family ready for their telehealth visit,’” Altieri said. “And hundreds of people at Nemours, in a sense, volunteered to do this.”

These digital navigators acted like a patient’s waiting room, helping them to work through digital forms or troubleshoot connectivity issues so that the healthcare experience was smooth for both the patient and the provider.

“Navigators really felt like they were contributing in a very big way,” Altieri continued. “Families were very appreciative of the handholding and the help that they were getting to get the care that they needed for their child because they were nervous through this whole thing.”

The digital divide is not a new problem, but when the pandemic emphasized the need for remote digital patient engagement and care access options, it became a notable one. The healthcare industry is keenly aware of already underserved populations falling further through the cracks, and the digital divide threatens that.

The current ad hoc solutions to poor digital health literacy and digital health access likely will not sustain true health equity. Rather, a multifaceted social determinants of health strategy, plus technology investments, will be critical.

After all, the digital divide is interrelated with other key social determinants of health, like race, income, or geographic location. As efforts continue on those fronts, accounting for the digital health access problems beleaguering already disadvantaged populations will be essential.

Charter announces broadband investment in Bamberg County

By News

Special to The T&D

Charter Communications Inc. has announced plans to deliver gigabit high-speed broadband to approximately 98,600 unserved South Carolina small businesses and homes, including properties in Bamberg County.

Today, 60% of Bamberg County’s more than 14,000 residents cannot access high-speed broadband.

As a result of Charter’s investment in South Carolina, an additional FCC-estimated 2,853 Bamberg County homes and small businesses will have access to gigabit connections from Spectrum Internet.

More than $362 million will be invested in South Carolina, which includes an expected private investment of at least $250 million by Charter and more than $112 million in support won by Charter in the FCC’s Rural Digital Opportunity auction.
Aiken Electric, CarolinaConnect partner to bring high-speed internet to rural areas
Local
Aiken Electric, CarolinaConnect partner to bring high-speed internet to rural areas

The effort is part of the company’s recently announced expected investment of approximately $5 billion — offset by $1.2 billion in RDOF support — to expand Charter’s network to what the FCC estimates to be more than 1 million homes and small businesses in lower-density, mostly rural communities across 24 states that do not have access to broadband service of at least 25/3 Mbps.

The new initiative is in addition to Charter’s existing network expansion.

100Mbps uploads and downloads should be US broadband standard, senators say

By News

Four US senators called on the Biden administration Thursday to establish a “21st century definition of high-speed broadband” of 100Mbps both upstream and downstream. This would be a big upgrade over the Federal Communications Commission broadband standard of 25Mbps downstream and 3Mbps upstream, which was established in 2015 and never updated by former President Trump’s FCC chair, Ajit Pai.

Today’s letter was sent to FCC Acting Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel and other federal officials by two Democrats, one independent who caucuses with Democrats, and one Republican. Noting that “the pandemic has reinforced the importance of high-speed broadband and underscored the cost of the persistent digital divide in our country,” they wrote:

Going forward, we should make every effort to spend limited federal dollars on broadband networks capable of providing sufficient download and upload speeds and quality, including low latency, high reliability, and low network jitter, for modern and emerging uses, like two-way videoconferencing, telehealth, remote learning, health IoT, and smart grid applications. Our goal for new deployment should be symmetrical speeds of 100 megabits per second (Mbps), allowing for limited variation when dictated by geography, topography, or unreasonable cost.

“We should also insist that new networks supported with federal funds meet this higher standard, with limited exceptions for truly hard-to-reach locations,” the senators wrote later in the letter. “For years, we have seen billions in taxpayer dollars subsidize network deployments that are outdated as soon as they are complete, lacking in capacity and failing to replace inadequate broadband infrastructure.”

The letter was written by Sens. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Angus King (I-Maine), Rob Portman (R-Ohio), and Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.). In addition to Rosenworcel, it was sent to Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo, Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack, and Director of the National Economic Council Brian Deese.

“Ask any senior who connects with their physician via telemedicine, any farmer hoping to unlock the benefits of precision agriculture, any student who receives livestreamed instruction, or any family where both parents telework and multiple children are remote learning, and they will tell you that many networks fail to come close to ‘high-speed’ in the year 2021,” they wrote. “For any of these functions, upload speeds far greater than 3Mbps are particularly critical. These challenges will not end with the pandemic.”

Rosenworcel pushed for higher speeds

Rosenworcel already supports a standard above the FCC’s current one. “With so many of our nation’s providers rolling out gigabit service, it’s time for the FCC to adjust its baseline upward, too,” she said in April 2020, calling for a 100Mbps download standard and an upload standard that’s higher than 3Mbps. “At present, our standard [for uploads] is 3 megabits per second,” she said at the time. “But this asymmetrical approach is dated. We need to recognize that with extraordinary changes in data processing and cloud storage, upload speeds should be rethought.”

The FCC standard is important for the commission’s annual broadband deployment report that determines how many Americans are “unserved” and grades the country’s progress toward universal availability. Adopting a higher speed standard would make it more likely that the FCC will find that broadband deployment is not happening fast enough and take more aggressive action to speed up deployment.

The FCC isn’t as active as it could be right now because there is a 2-2 split between Democrats and Republicans. President Joe Biden can fix that by nominating a new Democratic commissioner, but he hasn’t done so yet.

100Mbps a big upgrade for uploads

Going from 25/3Mbps to 100/100Mbps would be an especially large upgrade on the upload side. Today’s offerings from cable companies would not meet the 100Mbps threshold for uploads, as even gigabit-download cable plans from Comcast and Charter come with only 35Mbps upload speeds. The cable industry for years has been promising faster upload speeds powered by upgrades to DOCSIS, the Data Over Cable Service Interface Specification. But cable’s speeds are still unbalanced, providing much greater download speeds than upload speeds.

By contrast, AT&T and Verizon’s fastest fiber plans come with 940Mbps download speeds and 880Mbps upload speeds. Even the cheaper, lower-tier plans offered by fiber-to-the-home ISPs meet the senators’ proposed 100/100Mbps standard.

Cable is far more widespread than fiber in the US. The eight biggest cable companies combined have 72.8 million Internet subscribers, according to Leichtman Research Group. The top eight wireline phone companies have 33 million Internet subscribers, but that includes both fiber-to-the-home and DSL, and those copper-line DSL networks are severely outdated and poorly maintained.

A serious commitment to symmetrical 100Mbps broadband may require a lot more fiber construction across the US. The senators’ letter didn’t quite take a fiber-or-bust stand, but they do want federal funding in rural areas to support higher upload speeds than what you normally get with cable:

While we recognize that in truly hard-to-reach areas, we need to be flexible in order to reach unserved Americans, we should strive to ensure that all members of a typical family can use these applications simultaneously. There is no reason federal funding to rural areas should not support the type of speeds used by households in typical well-served urban and suburban areas (e.g., according to speedtest.net’s January 2021 analysis, average service is currently 180Mbps download/65Mbps upload with 24 millisecond latency.

The senators are also frustrated by differing standards across agencies. “We now have multiple definitions across federal agencies for what constitutes an area as served with broadband, resulting in a patchwork without one consistent standard for broadband,” they wrote. “For example, the FCC defines high-speed broadband as download speeds of up to 25 megabits per second and upload speeds of up to 3 megabits per second (25/3Mbps). Alternatively, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) defines it as just 10/1Mbps.”

FCC deployment data

The FCC is already supporting networks faster than the 25/3Mbps standard. The commission’s Rural Digital Opportunity Fund (RDOF) tentatively awarded $9.2 billion over 10 years to 180 entities to deploy broadband to 5.2 million unserved homes and businesses. The FCC said that “99.7 percent of these locations will be receiving broadband with speeds of at least 100/20Mbps, with an overwhelming majority (over 85 percent) getting gigabit-speed broadband.” The funding is going to a mix of cable, fiber, and fixed wireless providers, plus SpaceX’s Starlink satellite network.

The most recent FCC broadband deployment report said that, as of year-end 2019, 95.6 percent of Americans had access to fixed broadband with speeds of at least 25Mbps downstream and 3Mbps upstream. Deployment at higher speeds is more limited, especially in rural and tribal areas. For example, the report said that 250/25Mbps speeds are available to 87.2 percent of people nationwide, 55.6 percent of people in rural areas, and 49.6 percent of tribal residents.

Those data points likely undercount the number of unserved Americans because the FCC lets ISPs count an entire census block as served even if it can serve just one home in the block. The commission plans to collect geospatial maps from ISPs to make the data more accurate.

FCC commissioner wants more bandwidth, more jobs in Mississippi

By News

GULFPORT, Miss. (WLOX) – Federal Communications Commissioner Brendan Carr was in South Mississippi Thursday, working with state community college leaders and Southern District PSC Commissioner Dane Maxwell on creating more internet-broadband based jobs for that expanding industry.

“How do we have the workforce in place to build out the next generation of internet infrastructure which is 5G which is the fastest newest service?” Carr said. “Right now, we can almost double the amount of tower tech workers. We can hire 20,000 almost overnight.”

The current pool is 27,000 tower technicians and other broadband/internet based employees. He and others would like to expand that workforce through Mississippi’s community college system.

“We came up with an idea because we have such good community colleges, so we put them together and put everybody together and build a curriculum,” Maxwell said. “Build an apprentice program and get them trained and get them out.”

When they are out, they go to businesses like Millerco, a company based here in South Mississippi that has nine locations in four states.

“People don’t realize it takes a lot to make your cell phone work. It’s not magic and it’s not pixie dust. It’s hard, tough, dangerous work that these tower techs are doing and nationwide we’re looking at needing to fill about 20,000 positions,” said Jordyn Ladner, Millerco operations manager.

Carr and others also toured MGCCC’s Harrison County Campus and other areas of the Coast.

“We need to make sure that every community in this country has a fair shot and next gen internet,” Carr added. “It’s so critical whether it’s for distance learning, telehealth, or working remotely.”

Copyright 2021 WLOX. All rights reserved.

Deep dive: Tracking the past 12 months of telehealth at Yale New Haven Health

By News

By Bill Siwicki

12:03 PM

With a collaborative spirit and a drive to provide the virtual care patients wanted, the health system has grown its program by leaps – it now sees in 10 minutes the number of patients it used to see via telemedicine in a month.

ale New Haven Health in Connecticut is a five-hospital, seven-campus health system that includes a large physician practice, numerous ambulatory centers and a home care agency. It is affiliated with the Yale School of Medicine and its clinical faculty practice, Yale Medicine, which provides a depth and breadth of clinical expertise to support much of the health system’s telemedicine programs and provides existing infrastructure that supports joint development of telehealth programs.

All Yale New Haven Health entities are on a single instance of the Epic EHR that spans Connecticut into western Rhode Island and Westchester County, New York. The health system has developed tele-stroke, tele-ICU and on-demand video visit programs.

The crisis sets in

The COVID-19 crisis presented several challenges to the health system that amplified the need and impact of telehealth services.

To safely care for patients and provide additional safeguards for clinical staff, Yale New Haven Health had three clear needs to address:

  1. Rapidly expand the tele-ICU services to support a ballooning ICU census.
  2. Provide supportive services in med/surg units to allow nursing staff to cluster care activities to reduce utilization of PPE and potential staff exposure.
  3. Rapidly scale ambulatory telehealth to provide ongoing access to medical care for patients.

“The northeast U.S. was among the regions of the country affected early in the pandemic when little was known about transmission and when treatment was largely supportive care,” said Dr. L. Scott Sussman, physician executive director telehealth at Yale New Haven Health. “Additionally, since the availability of COVID testing was limited, patients who were suspected of having COVID needed the same isolation precautions and PPE as those patients who had already been diagnosed while we were awaiting test results.”

Early in the pandemic, Yale New Haven Health, like the rest of the nation, faced significant shortages of essentials including PPE, negative pressure rooms and testing supplies. These limitations had a direct impact on patient care and posed several problems:

  • Patients were cared for behind closed doors and with no visitors allowed, adding to their feeling of isolation.
  • Clinicians were anxious for the safety of the patient, themselves and their families.
  • PPE was in short supply.
  • Yale New Haven Health needed to maximize the safety and efficiency of care teams.

“To address these issues, we turned to telehealth to increase connections between patients and the families, to enable the care team to provide care while minimizing exposure risk,” Sussman explained. “We were fortunate to have enough PPE to see our patients, and innovative stewardship efforts and our telehealth equipment helped ensure our supply lasted, though we did not have excess.”

Challenges for physicians and nurses

These obstacles created a challenging environment for nursing and physician staff.

“The impact of our telehealth intervention is demonstrated by just one example: One of our ICU nurses was caring for a COVID-positive patient in March 2020,” Sussman recalled. “She heard the ventilator start to alarm because the tube became disconnected and ran into the room to care for the patient, without concern for her own risk of exposure.”

This level of commitment is not unique among frontline caregivers, and it was exactly the reason Yale New Haven Health put telehealth in place to monitor and intervene with patients remotely, he added.

“Not surprisingly, between lockdowns, limited PPE, visitor restrictions and concern about virus transmission, in-person outpatient care was not an option for most patients,” he noted. “We recognized that delaying important ambulatory care would be detrimental to health and could result in emergency department visits, which would put additional strain on those resources.”

Ambulatory video visits

Yale New Haven Health needed a solution that would connect clinicians with patients to provide care for both acute and chronic diseases. It leveraged and rapidly scaled its ambulatory video visit platform to meet the need for ambulatory care.

“In the past, we would have relied heavily on our vendor partners to provide these technical solutions,” Sussman observed. “Given the need to work quickly and at scale, the team looked to internalize these solutions, leveraging commercial computer and AV equipment along with software provided by our telehealth partner, InTouch, now part of Teladoc.”

“We see telehealth as a great opportunity to provide increased access to care, enhanced convenience, and to enrich the relationship between patients and their care teams. With that opportunity, though, are other challenges, including ensuring patient access to technology, broadband and digital literacy.”

Dr. L. Scott Sussman, Yale New Haven Health

Over the course of around a month, the team was able to support an expansion of tele-ICU services from 94 monitored rooms across three hospital locations to more than 200 rooms across the health system.

“This was done in conjunction with the expansion of clinical services from a 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. model to full 24/7 remote monitoring through the tele-ICU,” Sussman explained. “From a med/surg perspective, more than 1,000 telehealth carts were delivered to inpatient units throughout Connecticut and Rhode Island to ensure that nurses had the capability to interact with COVID-positive patients through real-time audio-visual solutions.

“The size of this effort and the time in which it was completed was nothing short of amazing,” he continued. “While Yale New Haven Health recognizes and appreciates the assistance offered by the FCC through its multimillion-dollar telehealth grant, we are equally as appreciative for the outpouring of support that allowed this to happen.”

Everyone pitched in

For several weeks, Yale New Haven Health had staff from across all aspects of the organization participating in this process – through the construction of equipment, testing and validation, and coordination of deliveries to inpatient units. This collaboration not only rapidly allowed the health system to meet patient care needs, it also resulted in more than $3 million in savings.

In-hospital telehealth, a combination of hardwired rooms in select ICUs and mobile carts in other units, facilitated care for admitted patients at each of Yale New Haven Health’s delivery networks and promoted PPE preservation.

This would allow two-way audio and video communication for patients who were admitted to the hospital. The InTouch platform allowed the care team to access patients who were admitted using audio and video technology, while decreasing the amount of PPE needed and minimizing exposure to COVID-19.

“For the tele-ICU, the telemedicine technology was expanded in conjunction with efforts from our clinical engineering team to integrate physiological monitoring into the proposed solution,” Sussman said. “In conjunction with the rapid construction of a new tele-ICU bunker to accommodate additional clinical support staff, the integrated team designed and built the capacity to monitor more than 200 simultaneous locations directly through our EHR.”

As a result of this work, Yale New Haven Health was able to:

  • Reduce the burden on intensivists to cover extended shifts.
  • Allow patients to remain at the local hospital location and receive medical care from a tertiary care hospital, which was especially important since many of the ICUs were full.
  • Reduce the need for direct patient/provider contact for COVID-positive patients.
  • Improve the overall safety and efficiency of services provided by allowing for an additional set of eyes and ears to support these critically ill patients.

“From the med/surg perspective, the primary focus was to address nursing needs around the preservation of PPE and the reduction of direct patient contact,” Sussman said. “Our implementation plan included rapid deployment of telehealth carts, as well as communication and education of nursing staff on the appropriate utilization of the new technology.”

Bi-directional communication with patients

All clinical staff were granted access to the telehealth platform through both mobile devices and desktop workstations in the units. The bi-directional communication with patients allowed the caregivers to remotely visit with the patients to assess care and answer any questions.

As an added benefit, the team was also able to develop a support model for virtual consults. This enabled specialty providers to meet with patients virtually when not available on site and is a care pathway that the health system intends to develop well past COVID-19 to improve both the efficiency and timeliness of care.

“In the ambulatory space, we set up telehealth visits for every department and section, which involved tremendous work by the Epic team,” Sussman noted. “They designed new workflows, created training for patients and clinicians, and provided support for patients who were new to telehealth, and set up a team of volunteers to convert patient visits to video and support patients on the download of necessary applications.”

The Vidyo platform was integrated into Epic and the MyChart patient portal, which facilitated patient video visits. This infrastructure allowed visits to occur virtually, since large numbers of face-to-face visits were not feasible.

“Telehealth technology allowed us to care for patients who were admitted to the hospital in a new and meaningful way,” Sussman observed.

“By facilitating connections between patients and the care team – nurses, trainees, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, therapists, physicians, etc. – we were able to provide care in ways that simply were not feasible without video technology. For example, our workforce, which at times was limited in seeing patients in person due to health restrictions, could care for patients remotely.”

New models of providing care

This also allowed the team to use new models of providing care – including assigning virtual advanced practice providers to provide care for groups of patients overseen by multiple attendings, who would use PPE and see the patient in person, and perhaps follow up in the afternoon via telehealth.

“Rounding on patients across multiple units became more straightforward, and taking the shuttle between campuses became optional, as we could see patients via telehealth as a supplement to in-person visits,” Sussman said.

“PPE preservation was another key factor, especially early in the pandemic. It is largely because we were able to use video technology to care for patients that we were able to maintain adequate supplies of PPE that our supply chain team worked hard to secure.”

In the ambulatory setting, telehealth facilitated care that otherwise would not have been possible.

“Initially, we used Vidyo and ultimately transitioned to Zoom,” Sussman recalled. “We provided individualized patient support for video visits – assistance with downloading software, logging in to the patient portal – and provided extensive training for clinicians on how to use the software effectively in order to connect with patients in meaningful ways.”

Zoom is integrated directly into Epic and allows links to be texted and emailed to patients and their family members so they can easily join visits. In addition, it incorporates interpreter services directly into the video visit to help ensure access to patients who might speak languages other than English.

The results

Since expansion of tele-ICU services, Yale New Haven Health has had more than 3,500 distinct video assessments performed by tele-ICU staff and more than 14,000 interventions ranging from ventilator management to restraint order compliance.

In addition, the tele-ICU staff are responsible for best practice rounding to ensure that patients have appropriate orders in place based on systemwide ICU patient management policies. While overall compliance goals are still being developed, the tele-ICU team has established greater than 90% compliance in management of CVAD, Foley Catheter and DVT prophylaxis order management.

“Overall, there have been thousands of inpatient consults completed using telehealth, which otherwise might not have been able to occur since some specialists were not able to see patients in the hospital due to their own health restrictions,” said Sussman.

“The technology helped mitigate burnout, since clinicians were able to care for patients across greater geographies without needing to travel, and allowed more clinicians to participate in care than would have otherwise been able to.”

Since March 2020, clinicians, nurses, therapists, chaplains and many other members of the team connected with patients and have spent more than 9,500 hours with admitted patients using telehealth.

“In 2019, we performed 316 ambulatory video visits across our health system, and in 2020 we completed more than 516,000, which is growth of more than 100,000%,” Sussman said. “Put another way, the number of patients we used to see per month now happens in 10 minutes. This unprecedented growth in video visits allowed patients to access care in ways that were meaningful to them, while keeping patients and clinicians safe.”

Taking care of patients at home

There was hesitancy to seek medical care in-person early in the pandemic, and telehealth provided a way for patients to receive medical care without leaving their homes.

“In two surveys of our patients and the public, we measured the adoption of and satisfaction with video visits,” Sussman said. “From greater than 3,000 responses, 72% of patients indicated they had participated in a video visit, 75% reported the quality was excellent or good, and 74% said they might or would do it again. Sixty-four percent of people responded that the ability to do video visits is a primary consideration in their selection of a provider or hospital.

“These are important indicators for us,” Sussman continued, “that telehealth is a durable and important mode of care.”

The FCC bequeaths $2.9 million

In May 2020, the FCC’s telehealth funding program awarded Yale New Haven Health a $2,875,781 grant to expand telemedicine during the COVID-19 crisis.

“These funds allowed us to understand how to effectively use telehealth technologies to support our clinical operations,” Sussman said. “Based on our experience through COVID, we are now redesigning our approach to telehealth services including significant investment in both technology solutions as well as staff to ensure that the program continues to grow to support the needs of our patients and caregivers.”

In addition to supporting the hardware acquisition to perform video visits, the FCC funds also covered the costs of software licensing with vendors. The combination of these created the infrastructure to complete more than 500,000 patient visits during COVID-19 and sets Yale New Haven Health up to meet the growing consumer demand for high-quality and accessible telehealth far beyond the pandemic and public health emergency, Sussman said.

“It is a silver lining of COVID, since it quickly accelerated our program to provide a service that our patients have clearly indicated they want,” he said. “We now offer telehealth visits in all specialties and are expanding our offerings outside of traditional hours to include evening and weekend appointments.”

Answering patient questions virtually

In addition, the telemedicine team has partnered with the patient access center to connect patients with medical questions, initially related to COVID-19, though now any topic, to facilitate telehealth visits on-demand.

“We see telehealth as a great opportunity to provide increased access to care, enhanced convenience, and to enrich the relationship between patients and their care teams,” Sussman said. “With that opportunity, though, are other challenges, including ensuring patient access to technology, broadband and digital literacy.”

Future federal funding may help address some of these issues, he added.

“Regardless, our system will continue to promote and deliver equitable access to healthcare through telehealth technology,” he concluded. “The infrastructure that now exists, due in part to the FCC funds, provides the foundation upon which our telehealth program can grow to extend health into our local communities and beyond by facilitating connections and making it easier to do the right thing.”

FCC PUBLIC NOTICE RE: Milestones for the Emergency Broadband Benefit Program

By News

PUBLIC NOTICE

DA 21-265

Released:  March 4, 2021

WIRELINE COMPETITION BUREAU Announces Initial Milestones for the Emergency Broadband Benefit Program
WC Docket No. 20-445

By this Public Notice, the Wireline Competition Bureau (Bureau) announces upcoming milestone dates for the Emergency Broadband Benefit Program (EBB Program), a $3.2 billion federal initiative created by Congress in the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021,[1] to help lower the cost of high-speed internet for eligible households during the on-going COVID-19 pandemic.[2]

On February 25th, the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) unanimously adopted a Report and Order that established the EBB Program.  The EBB Program Order directed the Bureau within seven days of adoption to announce a timeline for submission of information by broadband providers required by the Consolidated Appropriations Act to participate in the EBB Program.[3]

As adopted in the EBB Program Order and required by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, to participate in the EBB Program, broadband providers must submit information to the Bureau and the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) depending on the regulatory status of the broadband provider.[4]  Eligible telecommunications carriers (ETCs) and their affiliates in the states or territories where the ETC is designated can elect to participate in the EBB Program by filing the appropriate information with USAC and do not need to seek approval from the Bureau in those states.[5]  All other broadband providers need to seek approval from the Bureau to participate in the EBB Program.[6]  Additionally, any provider seeking to use an alternative verification process to make household eligibility determinations in the EBB Program must seek approval from the Bureau.[7]

In establishing these review processes, the Commission directed the Bureau to designate a priority application deadline by which non-ETC providers seeking approval to participate in the EBB Program will have the opportunity to obtain that approval prior to commencement of household enrollments.[8]  Applications received after the priority application deadline will be expeditiously reviewed on a rolling basis.[9]  Accordingly, the Bureau announces the following milestone dates for the provider application and election processes.

EBB Program MilestoneFiling LocationDate
Non-ETC Provider Application & Alternative Eligibility Verification Process Portal OpensBureauMarch 8, 2021
Provider Election Notice Inbox OpensUSACMarch 11, 2021
Non-ETC Provider Priority Application & Alternative Eligibility Verification Process DeadlineBureauMarch 22, 2021

 

As discussed in the EBB Program Order, the priority application deadline allows time for prospective providers to evaluate the rules of the EBB Program and prepare applications while at the same time also encouraging providers “to accelerate their consideration consistent with the need to quickly begin providing these supported broadband services.”[10]  The Bureau anticipates a large number of provider applications and elections, and these deadlines reflect the time needed for the Bureau and USAC to review the filings and provide sufficient notice to providers prior to the start of the EBB Program.  The Commission also directed the Bureau to announce at a later date other administrative deadlines or milestones, such as when the EBB Program will begin and when providers may begin enrolling households in the program.  The Commission expects that the EBB Program and enrollment process will begin in less than 60 days after the adoption of the EBB Program Order.[11]  The Bureau will announce in a future public notice the official commencement.

Providers seeking to participate in the EBB Program or receive approval of an alternative eligibility verification process must review all applicable program requirements and procedures as set forth in the EBB Program Order and any subsequent guidance for compliance with the EBB Program’s requirements.  To assist, the Bureau has created a webpage providing additional information about these approval processes and how to submit an application: https://www.fcc.gov/emergency-broadband-benefit-program.  Providers should use the same online application portal for non-ETC provider applications and requests for approval of an alternative eligibility verification process.  This online application portal will be available on the Bureau’s webpage under the “Provider FCC Approvals” section beginning March 8, 2021.  Non-ETCs that file complete applications for approval meeting the necessary criteria by the priority application deadline will know of their status prior to the start date for the EBB Program.[12]  These providers should obtain Bureau approval prior to filing their elections with USAC.[13]

Further information about the EBB Program, USAC’s role, and the provider election process can be found on the USAC webpage: https://www.usac.org/about/emergency-broadband-benefit-program/.  Providers seeking to file election notices should review the instructional information found on the USAC webpage for details about required information and how to submit the election.  Beginning March 11, providers can submit their forms and required attachments via email to [email protected]. The form and directions will be available soon at https://www.usac.org/about/emergency-broadband-benefit-program/system-resources/get-started.

– FCC –

[1] Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, Pub. L. No. 116-260, div. N, tit. IX, § 904, 134 Stat. 1182, 2130 (2020), available at https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/133/text (Consolidated Appropriations Act).

[2] See Emergency Broadband Benefit Program, WC Docket No. 20-445, Report and Order, FCC 21-29 (2021) (EBB Program Order).

[3] EBB Program Order, at para. 11.

[4] Id. at para. 15.

[5] Id.

[6] Id. at para. 25.

[7] Id. at para. 62.

[8] Id. at para. 15.

[9] Id. at para. 25.

[10] Id. at para. 15.

[11] Id. at para. 11.

[12] Id. at para. 15.

[13] Id.

USDA invests $2.8M in S.C. distance learning, telemedicine

By News

As part of a U.S. Department of Agriculture $24.3 million COVID-19 relief package extended to rural areas across the country, two Palmetto State school systems, a college and medical center will expand their telemedicine and distance learning platforms.

A $499,950 grant to Clinton College will go toward the establishment of a distance learning network linking libraries, churches and adult learning centers for residents in 12 rural counties in South Carolina. Funding will be used to back the school’s workforce certificate and college degree programs for adult learners, while the platform also will be used to offer pre-law and free virtual legal clinics from the North Carolina Central University School of Law.

The McLeod Regional Medical Center of the Pee Dee will make use of a $697,674 USDA grant to provide telehealth services to rural residents in Clarendon, Chesterfield, Marlboro and Florence counties, according to the release. Telehealth platforms will be installed at primary care offices in Manning and Cheraw for patients with lung ailments, as well as at public schools in the area to aid students with primary care visits and medication prescriptions.

The Pickens County School District received $845,291 to develop a distance learning and digital resource system for seven rural communities in the county through community support, dual-credit and foreign language courses, virtual field trips and professional development opportunities, as well as additional science, technology, engineering and mathematics classes, according to the release. The network is expected to serve 19,000 students.

Williamsburg County School District will create a distance learning system for dual enrollment students at third level institutions across the county with its $792,411 grant.

“The Distance Learning and Telemedicine program helps rural communities use the unique capabilities of telecommunications to connect to each other and to the world, overcoming the effects of remoteness and low population density,” USDA South Carolina Acting State Director for Rural Development Marty Bright-River said in the release.  “USDA is committed to working with the local communities to provide services which allows rural America equal access to quality health care and education, because we know when we work together, America prospers.”

Overall, the $42.3 million national investment, including $24 million sourced from the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act, will benefit an estimated 5 million rural residents, according to the release.